Viewpoint towards Mr Chan Lik Hoong
On Wed, 28 May 2025 at 10:52, Lau Wei Yiang <wylau1952@outlook.com> wrote:
Since Mr Chan's grandson is in Bullseye, why not we try to ask his grandson to lead the charge? Do you want his grandson to lead the charge, or Mr Chan himself?
From: Thomas Koshy <thomaskoshy082@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, 29 May, 2025 12:23 PM
To: Lau Wei Yiang <wylau1952@outlook.com>
Subject: Re: Mr Chan as the poster boy for Sports Day
Sent: Thursday, 29 May, 2025 12:23 PM
To: Lau Wei Yiang <wylau1952@outlook.com>
Subject: Re: Mr Chan as the poster boy for Sports Day
I'm fine with either.
From: Lau Wei Yiang <wylau1952@outlook.com>
Sent: Thursday, 29 May, 2025 6:07 PM
To: Thomas Koshy <thomaskoshy082@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Mr Chan as the poster boy for Sports Day
Sent: Thursday, 29 May, 2025 6:07 PM
To: Thomas Koshy <thomaskoshy082@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Mr Chan as the poster boy for Sports Day
I propose asking his grandson to be involved. We cannot use the Chee Fooi Foon method or else Mr Chan will get very angry.
Dear Mr Thomas,
After a long time of consideration, I have to admit that what you said about Mr Chan Lik Hoong last year following Sports Day is correct.
Mr Chan is responsible for the downfall of Bullseye because he is the highest position of all the management members in Nobel, being Advisor to the Management Team. He has a lot of influence on the Management members and policies, from security to safety and to Sports Day. But not all the initiatives came from him.
In 2017, when Bullseye lost the Sports Day, it took me time to comprehend that the Management is behind the downfall of Bullseye that year, despite Sean Mark saying so. Initially, when I told everyone in 2018 that the Management is theorized to have to be hating Bullseye, I just said it to motivate the members. However, when investigations in 2021 ruled the Management responsible in rigging all the Sports Day victory attempts for Bullseye, I feel disappointed.
In 2022, 2023 and 2024, when you first told me about what Mr Chan is talking about Bullseye, I at first thought it was weird, because your remarks were no different than those in my cohort who were playful and had disciplinary issues. However, investigations and feedback from students in Nobel had uncovered and proved the point of Mr Chan plotting the downfall of Bullseye.
Having known Mr Chan Lik Hoong for 17 years, I have had a lot of great memories with him, especially when he taught me Bible Knowledge in Year 7. However, hearing what he did for Bullseye made me quite shocked from what I have heard.
Putting such views aside, I personally feel that Mr Chan is a great man, given my interactions with him since I entered Year 1 in Nobel in 2008. However, regarding his action to Bullseye during Sports Day, I want to tell him that his actions will yield temporary success as Bullseye members will find a way to solve the problem in the long term. I would like to advise him to enjoy his peace of mind as Bullseye members know all the strategies he have plotted against Bullseye and will be ready to retake the trophy in 2026. If he wants to deny Bullseye the next victory in 2026, I wish him all the very best, and may God bless him.
Chan
The only way to counter Mr Chan is to do well in the athletics events on Sports Day. The only way he can deny Bullseye the win is via the judging events such as cheer, marchpast, dance, etc but not the athletics events.
He wants the athletic events to be the main spotlight. The Bullseye people will need to use this time to do so. But he has another twist. Instead of having strict qualification standards for Sports Day, it appears that the athletes are chosen via PE events.
Last time, folks at Nobel have a field for training, but it appears that training for Sports Day is now done via the PE lessons. I'm only afraid this will WRECK Bullseye at where it is most vulnerable.
The management is very clever. They can outsmart all strategies of ours just by the stroke of a pen.
_1.jpg)
No comments:
Post a Comment